Our Editorial Review Process
Last updated: March 27, 2026 · By the Coveragepriceguide Editorial Team
Every article published on Coveragepriceguide goes through a structured, six-step process designed to ensure accuracy, depth, and genuine usefulness for readers. We do not publish to fill space — we publish only when we have something accurate and actionable to say.
Step 1 — Topic Selection
Topics are selected based on three criteria: demonstrated reader demand (via search data and reader questions), gaps in existing coverage quality, and the ability of our specialists to add measurable value. We specifically prioritize questions that real people ask but existing content answers poorly — with vague generalizations, outdated statistics, or no actionable guidance.
If the best answer to a question already exists on the internet and we cannot meaningfully improve on it, we do not publish.
Step 2 — Expert Assignment
Each topic is assigned to the contributor whose professional background most directly qualifies them to cover it. We do not assign general-topic writers to specialized subjects. Contributors are required to disclose any financial interest, sponsorship, or relationship that could influence their coverage before assignment begins.
Step 3 — Research & Primary Sources
All factual claims must be sourced to a primary or high-quality secondary source before drafting begins. Acceptable primary sources include government databases, peer-reviewed research, official industry standards, and direct professional experience documented with specifics.
We do not accept other aggregator websites, AI-generated content, or unsourced blog posts as sources. If a claim cannot be sourced, it is not published.
Step 4 — Editorial Review
Every draft goes through a multi-point editorial review. Editors verify:
- Factual accuracy — every claim verified against its cited source
- Source quality — credibility standards met, publication date checked for currency
- Completeness — does the article directly answer the reader's question?
- Clarity — accessible to a general reader without sacrificing accuracy
- Conflicts of interest — all commercial relationships disclosed
- Actionability — does the reader leave with something useful?
Step 5 — Publication Standards
Published articles include a clear byline with the contributor's credentials, publication date, and last-reviewed date. All affiliate relationships or sponsored content are disclosed at the top of the article. We maintain strict separation between editorial content and commercial content.
Step 6 — Ongoing Maintenance
Every published article is on a 90-day review cycle. When significant changes occur — a regulatory update, new research, major market shift — we update sooner. Articles that cannot be updated to remain accurate are unpublished rather than left live with outdated information.
Reader feedback submitted through our "Was this helpful?" widget is reviewed weekly and informs content updates and new topics.
Questions about our process?
If you see something that does not look right, or have a question about a specific article's sourcing, contact our editorial team.
About Us · Contact · Email: [email protected]